Work Life Balance ;
A Literature Review
Table OF CONTENTS
Literature Review 3
Which Groups are Likely to be Most Vulnerable 5
The Question of Management 6
Docherty et al [ 1 ] in their book “Creating Sustainable Work Systems: Emerging Positions and Practice” bring forth the inquiry as to “Are people to function work or is work to function people? ” Clutterbuck [ 2 ] , besides addresses this aspect in “Managing the Work-Life Balance” where he attempts as he puts it, “… to unknot …” why the work-life balance is non and has non achieved the consequences that companies every bit good as authoritiess have hoped to accomplish in striking such a balance, with the worlds being that long hours are increasing alternatively of traveling in the coveted way. Docherty et al [ 3 ] see this job as one of companies making what they term as “… a work system …” that is comprised of “… functions, duties and relationships for acquiring work done that achieves a proper balance between engagement and battle on one manus and work-life balance on the other” . They point out that the job affecting the creative activity of fulfilling work that was non excessively insistent and deadening as a consequence of executing the same undertakings therefore developing into maps that could be compared to robotic, was a topic that developed in the mid 1960s [ 4 ] .
As the competition on the planetary sphere began to impact more straight on companies no longer insulated from direct competition by oceans, lodgers, distance and clip, through improved telecommunications in the 60s, 70’s and 80’s, and so the coming of the Internet and the dramatic alterations in how concerns compete, the force per unit areas of higher public presentation have continually built in this country. There has been a big organic structure of work devoted to this country, that includes the demand to increase stockholder value, present stock monetary value and profitableness consequences, all of which have further exacerbated the predating [ 5 ] . Therefore, the force per unit areas as caused by “The lifting power of capital markets, globalization of fiscal and merchandise markets and rapid technological alteration … ( created ) … force per unit areas for velocity and high public presentation levels” is referred to as “work intensity” .
This survey shall dig into the work-life balance, along with flexibleness, looking at the purposes and aims of Docherty et al’s [ 6 ] book sing this issue. The predating shall so be reviewed in an analysis of what is contained within that book, looking at statistical and study informations to correlate with the predating to find what is the position of the work-life balance and possible recommendations.
Docherty et al [ 7 ] brought forth the historical facets that have impacted upon the force per unit areas to increase productiveness in the face of heightened globalization, stakeholder and other developments. In add-on to the foregoing, they tell us that since 1992, research has uncovered “… increased emphasis, burnout, turnover, absenteeism, hurts and bosom diseases” have really impacted the ensuing increased productiveness, making a negative retarding force in footings of countries that have developed as a consequence of the foregoing [ 8 ] . The increased happening of these negative outgrowths is estimated to be the economic system of the European Union in surplus of 20 million Euros on an one-year footing [ 9 ] . Hourly work loads for workers in Europe have besides continued their upward ascent, which is besides the instance elsewhere. Americans spend more clip at work than any other part, entering on mean 350 more hours than their European every bit good as Nipponese opposite numbers [ 10 ] . So permeant is the American compulsion that merely 8 per centum are willing “to work fewer hours for less pay” [ 11 ] . The preceding is stating position when one compares this against Britain and Japan where 30 per centum of the work force is willing to set in less hours for less wage, and Germany, where 38 per centum are prepared to make this [ 12 ] .
The wellness, mental and emphasis jobs have increased costs for medical attention every bit good as clip lost from work, and has lowered productiveness as a consequence of burnout and stressed work absences and hapless public presentation that affects the overall public presentation degrees [ 13 ] . The attending to the predating countries has increased as a field of survey since the mid 1990s when the tendency was uncovered, interestingly co-occuring with the coming of the Internet and increased competitory force per unit areas brought on by the aforesaid globalization [ 14 ] . Docherty et al set this all compactly in stating us [ 15 ] :
“Simply put, capitalist economy is distributing around the universe – at least in the debut of market forces, freer trade and widespread deregulating. It means that international trade and investing play a much greater function in many economic systems. World trade is increasing much more quickly than universe production, bespeaking turning mutuality among states. Foreign direct investings are besides increasing at a more rapid rate bespeaking closer ties in the production of goods and services among different states. The development of the fiscal markets may be said to hold exploded in the 1990s. The value of the day-to-day trade in the markets for currency, portions, bonds, etc. , is in the order of millions of dollars. The turnover in these markets is really rapid ; for new guess merchandises such as index options and hereafters, it is every few hours or days” .
Information engineering is a 2nd facet that has increased the force per unit areas of competition on a planetary graduated table, and therefore “The gait of work is increasing …” , along with direction patterns such as “… retrenchment, outsourcing and impermanent employment …” have all brought Forth the demand to happen ways to command costs every bit good as retain workers, and cut down burnout [ 16 ] . All of the foregoing have contributed to what is termed as “work intensity” [ 17 ] , with “… work related emphasis …” and the effects originating from it, as evidenced by 147 million workers in the European Union being subjected to holding to execute their undertakings at of all time increasing rates of velocity every bit good as tight deadlines to keep fight with low pay states [ 18 ] . Factors that have made the work-life balance a modern-day issue are the fact that European workers [ 19 ] :
“…third have no influence on undertaking order, and more than one-fourth can non act upon their work beat. Up to 45 per cent study holding humdrum undertakings ; 44 per cent no undertaking rotary motion, 50 per cent short insistent undertakings. Such work-related ‘stressors ‘ are likely to hold contributed to the present spectrum of ill-health: 13 per cent of the work force complain of concern, 17 per cent of muscular strivings, 20 per cent of weariness, 28 per cent of ‘stress ‘ and 30 per cent of backache, and many other, even potentially dangerous, diseases. Some European states have even reported Karochi, the Nipponese phenomenon of sudden bosom failure at work.”
Docherty et al [ 20 ] advises that the work-life balance has been pushed to near the top of worker concerns in a figure of states by employees as their top three precedences. Worker insecurity has been cited as a cardinal concern originating from downsizing, and industry consolidation that has been rampant since the late ninetiess as a consequence of stockholder value, stock monetary values and public presentation, replacing stakeholder value [ 21 ] . The predating facets, in combination, have been factors that have been behind the outgrowth of the work-life balance as a modern-day concern issue.
Which Groups are Likely to be Most Vulnerable
The renunciation jobs of increased emphasis, higher work tonss, longer hours, faster production quotas, and or demands and force per unit areas ensuing from downsizing, consolidation, and outsourcing have impacted line workers and direction at that degree, with in-between direction topic to lesser force per unit areas as a consequence of them being the execution conduits for top direction policies [ 22 ] . Merlie and Paoli [ 23 ] in helping us to understand the impact of increased demands on line and staff workers conducted a 10 twelvemonth survey of the increasing instability in the life-work state of affairs, and found that as a consequence of increased demands for productiveness, keeping onto one’s occupation in the face of heightened productiveness demands every bit good as more undertakings that 28 per centum of European Union employees are exposed to more emphasis, with “… 56 per centum of employees are exposed to high velocity work, 67 per cent to work gait dictated by clients, and 40 per cent to humdrum work” . The predating descriptions clearly identify line and staff worker places as opposed to middle and upper direction. The study as conducted by Merlie and Paoli [ 24 ] represented the 3rd in a series of surveies committee by the European Union to analyze working conditions that clearly revealed that the state of affairs in footings of longer hours, added emphasis, increased illness from work related conditions, and other issues were increasing.
The study [ 25 ] added that work ploddings as represented by [ 26 ] :
“… high physical and psychological burden, physical wellness jeopardies and humdrum work, are still at that place. For case, in the Third European Survey on Working Conditions, 47 per cent of employees interviewed reported working in painful or palling places and 37 per cent that they have to manage heavy tonss. Both of these figures had increased ( from 43 per cent and 31 per cent, severally ) when compared to twelvemonth 1990 study consequences, i.e. to the first moving ridge of the European working status surveys.”
The Question of Management
The inquiry of good direction and higher productiveness coming at the disbursal of a work-life balance is a hard proposition to compare as a consequence of the differing industries involved, and therefore the different educational demands, handiness of work force replacings. It is easy to see that low skilled occupations are more at hazard as workers can be easy replaced with minimum loss of productiveness and preparation. The higher the skill degree the higher the trouble in replacing, therefore doing a sweeping analysis of the predating more hard in footings of generalizations.
Management at houses are aware of the foregoing and there is grounds of good pattern at a figure of companies to better the work-life balance in their undertakings in consort with the policy of the European Union [ 27 ] . The “Working Time Directive, 93/194 EC” sets forth models naming for employers to develop good direction patterns that promote more work flexibleness every bit good as better conditions and the usage of production and procedure methods that ease the emphasis of occupations, while keeping productiveness degrees as the EU recognises the competitory nature of globalization dictates high end product in order to stay competitory [ 28 ] . The EU studies that the job of advancing good direction policies is non every bit much a constituent of acknowledgment and or direction will, as it is costs and fight, particularly among SME’s [ 29 ] . The European definition of an SME is: [ 30 ]
“is a company that
• has fewer than 250 employees
• has either an one-year turnover non transcending ˆ40 million, or an one-year
balance sheet entire non transcending ˆ27 million
• is independent. This means that less than 25 per cent of the capital or
vote rights are owned by one endeavor, or jointly by several endeavors,
falling outside the definitions of an SME.
The definition besides distinguishes between ‘micro ‘ , ‘small ‘ , and ‘medium sized ‘ endeavors based chiefly upon figure of employees.
• Micro endeavors have fewer than 10 employees
• Small fewer than 50
• Medium sized fewer than 250.”
Statistically, micro, little and average endeavors in the European Union comprise 99 per centum of the projected 19.2 million endeavors that are in the European Union, stand foring about 65 million occupations that are an estimated two-thirds of all people employed in the EU [ 31 ] . On norm, European companies employ 4 persons, which includes the proprietor and or director [ 32 ] . The foregoing statistics, in footings of SME employment are reasonably much representative of employment forms in the United States, where between 80 and 90 per centum of companies are SMEs, 81 per centum in Japan, and overall 95 % for all Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development ( OECD ) states [ 33 ] . The predating apprehension is of import in comparing the context if good direction and higher productiveness comes at the disbursal of work-life balance ( WLB ) , or is good work-life balance an of import constituent of the direction of successful houses? ’ The reply to the inquiry, as stated, is based upon variables as determined by the size of the house every bit good as the type of places being discussed. A company using scientists, high-ranking applied scientists and other similar places are less prone to the jobs faced by lower degree line staff members, and those employed in SMEs.
The European Union studies that prosecuting work-life policies are in general non put into force in SMEs as a consequence of the costs they assume are involved [ 34 ] . The facts are, that using the rules put forth by Equal [ 35 ] represent:
“iˆiˆ Address alteration and promote adaptability and mobility in the labour market: … undertake appropriate steps to promote…a better balance between work and private life and between flexibleness and security.
Gender equality: peculiar attending will be given to accommodating work and private life, notably through the proviso of attention services for kids and other dependents, promoting the sharing of household and professional duties and easing return to work after a period of absence.”
The foregoing is in maintaining with the concerns in the European Union sing the advancement of occupations and the authorization for making a better work-life balance for persons and their households every bit good as to make conditions that make it attractive for older persons to stay in the work force [ 36 ] . The worlds of globalization every bit good as ageing are mentioned as principles for the preceding, along with the demand for persons to stay in the work force for longer periods, and the benefits employers can have from their mentoring and experience [ 37 ] . The United Kingdom passed The Working Time Regulations in 2000 that were amended in 2003 in maintaining with the predating [ 38 ] . Docherty et al [ 39 ] advise, “the new direction philosophies are casting parturiencies, as illustrated by the followers ;
“Many undertakings have high prescriptions, but low restriction and merely limited design, in order to guarantee flexibleness. Rigorous clip ordinances are no longer possible and work procedures can non be prescribed in item. In add-on, a complex and non-transparent engineering raises uncertainness and excess attempt in usage. This complex and unpredictable state of affairs undermines the traditional footing for commanding strength and equilibrating work load with available resources.”
The new attack in footings of good direction pattern entails the increased usage of teamwork in sharing work loads and therefore cut downing emphasis as a means to run into production end product through incorporate attempts as opposed to single trust [ 40 ] . The foregoing is the antonym of the criterion runing manner whereby: [ 41 ]
“Learning and uninterrupted betterment are demands on top of productive work. Competence development outside working hours is expected. Organizations are in a uninterrupted flux implying instability and uncertainness. In add-on, employees experience discontinuity and capriciousness induced by frequent alterations in policy and direction philosophy.”
Therefore, good direction patterns entail a committedness to turn to the rule factors lending to heightened emphasis that Docherty et Al [ 42 ] identify as work strength that has as some of its constituents increased degrees of conformance and or obeisance. The object is to construction a on the job environment that “…fosters a strong committedness of the employees to the values and ends of the company” [ 43 ] . Docherty et al [ 44 ] advise that “…new direction techniques are chiefly designed to aline all energy and the whole personality of the employees towards their occupations, therefore making strength at work” . Another attack that garners some opposition among directors is termed as the resource-centred position Docherty et al [ 45 ] . The opposition factor is a consequence of what Docherty et al [ 46 ] advise in that:
“ ( a ) directors do non truly desire to portion power ; or they are non able to comprehend the disagreement between their ideal support of authorization, and their existent behavior ; ( B ) workers are socialized under restrictive conditions and accordingly decline more responsibility.”
They point out that sharing power and granting degrees of liberty assistance in linking workers to the ends and aims of the company, with a greater grasp for what needs to be done and why [ 47 ] . Inclusion in the larger image that seeks their cooperation broadens the position and grasp of employees for what is being attempted, and therefore an apprehension of what is being asked of them. If one looks closely at the preceding, they can see that merely handling employees as lending members of the working society has a good consequence on workplace harmoniousness, understanding and intent.
The predating scrutiny of the book “Creating Sustainable Work Systems: Emerging Positions and Practice “ by Docherty et al [ 48 ] brought forth the inquiry as to whether “Are people to function work or is work to function people? ” Studies as conducted by Merlie and Paoli [ 49 ] advised that over a 10 twelvemonth period as covered by three separate surveies, it was found that the European Union as a whole was sing heightened demands with regard to productiveness. In a primary survey undertaken to dig into the varied issues lending to increased emphasis, a Questionnaire was completed by 22 respondents with the undermentioned demographic profile:
Coachs:4Security:5Administrative:5Student aid:5Others:3( receptionists )
Gender: Male-10( 45.5 % ) Female-12( 54.5 % )
Chart 1 – Respondent Profile
In footings of the mode in which the respondents replied, it was uncovered that long working hours was cited as the biggest hurdle to accomplishing a work-life balance, and that flexible options such as working from place stand foring an options that is incompatible with the bulk of lower lever staff member places where work related emphasis is the highest. It was besides exposed that males seek a agency to decide their long hours and transposing times, whereas females seek benefits as represented by more flexible agreements that are aligned with household every bit good as quality of life grounds. The survey revealed that males every bit good as females did non believe their callings might be jeopardised through work-life agreements, and therefore neither agreed nor disagreed with the proposition.
Table 1- Career suffer- Males and Females
|CAREER SUFFER FROM FLEXIBILITY|
|Strongly Disagree||Disagree||Neither Agree or Disagree||Agree||Strongly Agree|
Commuting contributes to emphasize regardless of which method selected, public and or vehicle. As portion of the survey, an effort was made to compare if a relationship existed between the clip it took to transpose, and a possible consequence on public presentation every bit good as emphasis at work. The following Table ( 2 ) , revealed that those who are engaged in longer commutes revealed more emphasis than those whose journey was shorter. Public conveyance was indicated as being more nerve-racking as a consequence of less control over agendas, holds, and herding conditions.
Table 2- Comparison between Commuting Time & A ; Street at Work
|Stress AT WORK|
|Yes||No||I Do Not Know|
|Commutation Time||Under 30 Minutess||3||3||1|
|30 Minutes to 1 Hours||8||3||1|
|More Than 1 Hour||3|
Employer outlooks with respect to overtime besides contributed to work-life emphasis as it encroached on personal clip, and therefore household duties thereby making a status where more had to be accomplished by employees in that respect, with less clip available. The following revealed the sentiments of respondents on this issue:
Table 3- Expected to work excess hours
|Neither Agree or Disagree||7||31.8|
The study uncovered an highly high proportion ( 80 % ) of workers put in overtime hours over their contract, with the class of security officers as the one recording virtually no overtime hours.
Chart 2 – Overtime Hours
In footings of if respondents were satisfied with their present work-life balance agreements, surprisingly most indicated that this was the instance, as shown below:
Chart 3 – Satisfaction with Work Life Balance
The book by Docherty et al [ 50 ] was non able to supply the predating positions from employees, which is interesting in visible radiation of the fact that Europeans are progressively seting in longer hours, with higher grades of productiveness being asked to them. The work by Docherty et al [ 51 ] besides did non supply any correlativities refering the per centum of employers that have work-life balance plans in force, but facts as provided by Equal [ 52 ] indicated that SME’s, that employ two tierces occupations in the European Union, are dawdlers in using work-life plans due to sensed costs.
The outgrowth of concerns for work-life balance represents an issue borne out of the heightened corporate fight brought Forth by globalization that has houses carry oning cross boundary line concern in a pursuit for enlargement, new markets and increased net incomes has reshaped the kineticss of the mode in which houses conduct their concern. Outsourcing, retrenchment, decreased staffs, increased hours and more duties have added considerable emphasis to the working environment that since the early 1990s has seen a considerable addition in employee burnout, turnover, higher degrees of emphasis, more work related hurts, absences from work and other wellness related jobs. Docherty et al [ 53 ] estimated that the productiveness losingss to the European Union economic system as a consequence of the preceding are in the scope of 20 million Euros on an one-year footing.
Lower rewards and other costs as bing in some developing states such as China, South America and other parts have caused European companies to seek a agency to countervail their higher operating costs by increasing productiveness that has increased the sum of work and hours of employees, doing added force per unit areas to execute. Docherty et al [ 54 ] referred to the preceding as work strength, with European workers holding less input on the mode in which their undertakings are performed as direction seeks to increase production through new steps. Information in this respect as uncovered by Docherty et al [ 55 ] found that insistent undertakings were up by an norm of 45 per centum, with 44 per centum of workers holding no rotary motion of work maps therefore increasing the rate of repetitiousness. The work conducted by Docherty et al [ 56 ] found that the overall addition in work, public presentation, excess hours and emphasis has had a negative consequence on employee wellness. The figures reported that 13 per centum of the entire work force reported concerns, 17 per centum complained of muscular strivings, weariness was mentioned by 20 per centum, emphasis by 28 per centum, with backache reported by 30 per centum [ 57 ] .
The foregoing, interestingly did non correlate in footings of work satisfaction and other countries as conducted by the limited primary study that consisted of 22 respondents. In footings of work satisfaction, the respondents indicated a high degree of satisfaction with their present places:
Chart 3 – Satisfaction with Work Life Balance
The preceding does non apparently correlate with what Docherty et al [ 58 ] , Maslach and Leiter [ 59 ] , and Kompier and Cooper [ 60 ] revealed in their work. Docherty et al [ 61 ] bring Forth the fact that the increased force per unit areas to rise productiveness have helped to take worker latitudes in how their undertakings are performed, therefore doing the corporation more of a control platform driven by net incomes, competitory dictates, and stockholder concerns. Maslach and Leiter [ 62 ] provide us with an apprehension of the mode in which line workers and lower direction, fundamentally termed as supervisors, are more vulnerable to work-life balance emphasis and related conditions as they province “…such an instability between an person and his/her work leads non merely to tiredness or sadness, but besides to ‘erosion in values, self-respect, spirit, and will – an eroding of the human soul” . The predating statement sounds a small old school in its method of give voicing the fortunes, but it provides an apprehension of the mode in which these groups are vulnerable to work-life balance emphasis. The predating statement posed by Maslach and Leiter [ 63 ] is farther elaborated upon by them saying how the increased demands made on line workers has increased the instability between their demands at work, and a decrease of clip off that has increased the psychological force per unit areas on lower degree workers whereby the added emphasis impacts them even when they are non working. Kompier and Cooper [ 64 ] tell us that the negative psychological effects impact the lower degrees of work, line and staff workers, whose occupations can either be downsized and or eliminated more easy.
The ground as to why there is apparently a divergency between the primary survey and the information as gathered from books, diaries and other beginnings have a figure of accounts. The first is represented by prejudice which is represented by respondents replying inquiries in a mode that they think is appropriate every bit good as the trying size non being big plenty or reflective of the sample population [ 65 ] . Given that merely 22 respondents where utilized, the study provides interesting points that may or may non correlate with the existent existence. However, in the absence of conflicting informations from the researched stuffs it can non be stated that such findings might non reflect the positions that prevail in this state of affairs. However, as noted, bias is present in the study as it was conducted among employees at a university puting which is non representative of the entire on the job environment that would include factory workers, building, labor, clerical forces, call Centres and the similar. However, as it does stand for a limited study sampling, so benefit can be attributed to its responses in the context of the existence represented.
The concerns that have been raised by the European Union sing the increased emphasis, unwellness, work force per unit area and related degrees that has and is happening, is at the head of bring oning alteration. In the United Kingdom, The Working Time Regulations in 2000 that were passed in 2000 and amended in 2003 has set voluntary guidelines for employers to follow new direction methodological analysiss that include more inclusion by employees in the design of work procedures every bit good as the initiation of flexible working agreements where possible. In the study that was conducted among those employed in a university puting where work at place possibilities where available, as shown by the followers:
Table 4 – Flexible Work Agreements
|Working WITH CLIENTS/STUDENTS|
|INTERESTED IN||Job Sharing+Part-Time||1||2|
|Job Sharing+Home Working||3||1|
|Job Sharing+Compressed Week||3||2|
|Home Working+Compressed Week||2|
The correlativity factors that was non present in the literature reviewed is the sentiments of the working population that presents their positions of the parametric quantities raised. That information represents an highly import set of points to pull decisions from.
In analyzing the information as presented herein, there are a figure of of import points that apparently offer countries of recommendation that could be employed by SMEs without bing them expense in their execution. The foregoing was a factor given by the Equal [ 66 ] plan of the European Union in that SMEs believe that the added cost is a factor they can non afford in implementing better work-life plans. The foregoing represents an country for increased instruction on the portion of authorities that could be solved by using electronic mails to inform SMEs of varies ways in which they could take part. SMEs have been mentioned here, as larger companies, intending those in surplus of 250 employees, have the resources in footings of HR sections to follow work-life balance plans if they are so inclined.
The database records of many SME proprietors include email references, a cost effectual manner to do contact that does non imply printing and other governmental disbursals to implement. Through a series of email letters, SME proprietors could be appraised of assorted ways in which to implement work-life balance plans that would non stand for a cost disbursal. In add-on, a newssheet that contains success narratives of work life balance plans implemented among SMEs might really good indicate out steps that addition productiveness, and other bottom line countries while cut downing employee emphasis and other factors.
An thought that could be implemented by some SMEs, depending upon the nature of their concern class, could present staggered work plans whereby employees could get for work at hours either before and or after the busy commuting clip period. Retail and service operations the interface with the populace might hold a hard clip implementing this in some cases. Staggered describing times could be rotated to supply all employees with the benefit of late reaching every bit good as early reaching, therefore easing transposing times as the early reachings would go forth in forepart of the traffic bubble, and late reachings would go forth after. Reduced commuting clip would apparently hold benefits in exciting the work force, with public presentation awards including an early reaching agenda on Fridays, and a ulterior reaching on Mondays to supply more weekend clip for employees whose work has either surpassed quotas, and or whom have performed at a higher degree. The early Friday reaching, late Monday reaching agenda could besides be rotated and traded among employees to supply extra spirit of teamwork and working together.
The preceding is a comparatively simple application that could be easy implemented in retail constitutions, depending upon coverage and traffic demands to help in added clip for employees through lessened commutation. Work at place agendas for smaller SME’s seems as an improbable option given that there is small administrative or other maps that could be performed outside of the office, nevertheless, there really good could be cases whereby this might stand for a reasonable option. The state of affairs for SMEs is much different than for houses outside of this class in that they do non hold the resources to implement broad ranging and or wide plans, therefore their options are limited to work-life applications that fundamentally have no costs attached.
The benefits to SMEs in looking at ways in which to implement work-life balance plans could give them benefits from a more satisfied work force that has less emphasis, and lower rates of absence. Other attacks to a work-life balance taken by SMEs could dwell of including employees in workflow design and assignment duties. Merlie and Paoli [ 67 ] mentioned the preceding as an of import subscriber to feelings of distance and ineptitude, every bit good as insecurity about their places, emphasis making state of affairss.
It is understood that the different nature of the working composing of SMEs makes the execution of about any type of plan as hard, due to the force per unit areas of merely remaining in concern as the over-riding primary concern of the endeavor and their enterprisers. However, as is by and large the instance with plans directed at employee good being, they are received good and therefore assistance in making a higher grade of engagement every bit good as sense of belonging and feeling valued. The renunciation is an aim of work-life plans irrespective of the size of a company, therefore it represents a position that bears consideration.
Clutterbuck, D. ( 2003 )How to acquire the payback from investing in work-life balance.Retrieved on 18 April 2008 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.coachingnetwork.org.uk/ResourceCentre/Articles/ViewArticlePF.asp? artId=83
Docherty, P. , Forslin, J. , Shani, A. ( 2002 )Making Sustainable Work Systems: Emerging Positions and Practice.Routledge. London, United Kingdom
Easterby-Smith, M. , Thorpe, R. , Lowe, A. ( 2002 )Management Research: An Introduction. Sage Publications. London, United Kingdom. P. 53
Equal. ( 2007 )Policy Briefss: Equal parts to bettering the work-life balance of adult females and work forces.Retrieved on 19 April 2008 from hypertext transfer protocol: //ec.europa.eu/employment_social/equal/policy-briefs/etg4-having-life_en.cfm
Equal ( 2006 )Thematic Update: Subject F:( Work-Life Balance ) Equal Support Unit, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Karmel, S. , Bryon, J. ( 2002 ) A Comparison of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Europe and in the USA: European Capital Markets Institute. Routledge. London, United States
Kline, J. ( 2005 ) Ethics for International Business: Decision Making in a Global Political Economy. Routledge. London, United Kingdom. P. 86-87
Kompier, M. , Jones, F. ( 1999 )Introduction: Improving work, wellness and productiveness through emphasis bar. Routledge. London, United States, p. 45. In Docherty, P. , Forslin, J. , Shani, A. ( 2002 )Making Sustainable Work Systems: Emerging Positions and Practice. Routledge. London, United Kingdom. P. 7
Maslach, C. , Leiter, M. ( 1997 )The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Make About It.Jossey Bass. San Francisco, CA, United States. P. 17. In Docherty, P. , Forslin, J. , Shani, A. ( 2002 )Making Sustainable Work Systems: Emerging Positions and Practice. Routledge.London, United Kingdom. P. 7
Merlie, D. , Paoli, P. ( 2000 )The Years of Working Conditions in the European Union. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Dublin, Ireland. In Docherty, P. , Forslin, J. , Shani, A. ( 2002 )Making Sustainable Work Systems: Emerging Positions and Practice. Routledge. London, United Kingdom. P. 7
opsi.gov.uk ( 2003 )Statutory Instrument 2003 No. 1684: The Working Time ( Amendment ) ordinances 2003.Retrieved on 19 April 2008 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2003/20031684.htm
Reich, R. ( 2000 )The Future of Success. Alfred E. Knopf. New York, New York, United States. P. 6. In Docherty, P. , Forslin, J. , Shani, A. ( 2002 )Making Sustainable Work Systems: Emerging Positions and Practice.Routledge. London, United Kingdom. P. 3
Riedmann, A. , Bielenski, H. , Szezurowska, T. , Wagner, A. ( 2006 )Working Time and work-life balance in European companies. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Dublin, Ireland
siteresources.worldbank.org. ( 2007 )SME Statistics.Retrieved on 19 April 2008 from hypertext transfer protocol: //siteresources.worldbank.org/CGCSRLP/Resources/SME_statistics.pdf
Wickham, J. ( 2000 )Organizational alteration, work and ICTs.Paper presented at Towards a Learning Society. Lisbon, Portugal