Social Justice & the Catholic Church

Social Justice & A ; the Catholic Church

“Religion is the set beliefs, feelings, tenet and patterns that define the dealingss between human being and sacred or divinity” ( Green, 1962, pg. 1 ) . Religion is a manner for people to hold a strong assurance in something greater than themselves. Religion besides brings integrity to communities by making stableness and order. On the other manus, some critics may reason that faith creates more struggle than declaration, due to corruptness and contradiction. Religion can be defined in three features: Beliefs and spiritual patterns, the spiritual feeling ( such as religion ) , and integrity in a community of those who portion the same religion ( such as the Church ) ” ( Green, 1962, pg. 1 ) . Therefore, this essay will discourse the changing nature and positions of Catholicism on societal justness issues such as reproduction, offense and penalty, and same-sex matrimony. This essay will reason that Catholicism has now taken a more flexible attack to societal justness issues in comparing to how Catholicism was practiced before.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Many societal theoreticians of the yesteryear have seen the diminishment of faith as imminent and desirable ( Mainwaring, 1986 ) . For case, in 1830, Ludwig Feuerbach dismissed faith as a projection, and deemed that it would non last long. At the same clip, Marx agreed with this appraisal and believed that faith was an ideological bewilderment that created a divide between the middle class and the remainder of the categories ( Mainwaring, 1986 ) .

In a survey conducted by Cook ( 1993 ) and associates, a province issue canvass was conducted in 1990 to find whether Roman Catholicism affects abortion attitudes. The individual-level effects in which the Church socializes single members was compared aboard contextual effects, in which the Church affects abortion attitudes by changing the footings of the argument outside the Church’s rank ( Cook et al. , 1993, p. 223 ) . Both effects were found to be statistically important ( the effects were dependable ) , although the contextual effects of Catholicism were negative ( Cook et al. , 1993, p. 223 ) . This portion of the survey suggested that the Catholic Church is affectional in learning anti-abortion attitudes to its members, but that a strong Catholic presence in a province influences citizens in a counter mobilisation manner, on the portion of non-Catholics ( Cook et al. , 1993, p. 223 ) .

Oliver ( 2008 ) makes an first-class point in understanding the relationship between the Catholic Church and societal justness. For case, Oliver ( 2008 ) states that in order to hold a deeper apprehension of the Catholic position of offense and condemnable justness, one must hold an apprehension of the cardinal construct that lies at the bosom of the condemnable justness system ( p. 3 ) . For case, there is a human desire for justness. In Catholicism, there are those who are spiritual that seek justness in the universe so that God’s will is done on Earth. There are besides a set group of people who profess no faith that seek justness through the tribunal system based on the regulation of jurisprudence. [ 1 ]

Oliver ( 2008, p. 223 ) besides points out that in the mid-1800’s, the Catholic Church had prodded the medical community to forestall accoucheuses and knave physicians from executing abortions. Further, the Catholic Church drew upon the fact that abortion was immoral, and therefore both the Catholic Church and many doctors argued that the wellness of the adult female was put at hazard ( Oliver, 2008, p. 223 ) . However, as consciousness sing abortions grew and as clip went on, there were altering attitudes towards abortion. For case, physicians claimed that they should be the lone 1s to transport out abortions ( although they were the same physicians that felt it was morally incorrect ) , and the American Medical Association began to keep the reigns of the issues of abortion more so than the Catholic Church. Therefore, since the subject of abortion is a societal justness issue in which Catholic positions on the issues have been altering every bit opposed to stagnant, this supports the thesis that Catholic point of views are going less rigorous than they were antecedently.

The other issue related to the societal justness subject of abortion is the subject of justness in and of itself. Justice in the Catholic religion brings in another position. From the Catholic point of view, justness is based on the word of God, the instruction of Jesus Christ, and the Traditions of the Roman Catholic Church ( Oliver, 2008, p. 4 ) . Furthermore, in American penal organisations, Post-revolutionary Catholicism favoured a democratic theoretical account of authorization, local liberty, and the separation of the Church and the province ( Stotnicki, 2013, p. 83 ) . In other words, a congregational form of church civil order was regarded as the most acceptable theoretical account of the prison system ( Stotnick, 2013, p. 83 ) . Therefore, this points to a symbiotic relationship between Catholicism and the condemnable justness system in which Catholicism worked hand-in-hand with societal justness, and in some instances, taking marks of faith from within the system to keep the justness system’s liberty. However, in 1973 an event in New York changed the landscape in which Catholic instructions would be allowed in the penal system. For case, in 1973, the United States Catholic Conference ( USCC ) published a Reform paper on Correctional Institutions in the 70s and claimed that certain patterns they were advocates of, reduced recidivism rates, while consequences showed the opposite-that recidivism rates increased with such patterns ( Stotnicki, 2013, p. 84 ) .

The other issues with the paper were that the paper called for rehabilitation without specifying what it meant by the term and what ends would be accomplished ( Ibid. , p. 84 ) . Last, the paper called for options to prison, without giving illustrations of such options ( Ibid. , p. 84 ) . Furthermore, Stotnicki ( 2013 ) argues that the construct of disincentive does non suit in with the Catholic faith. Therefore, this could indicate to delineation where the Catholic tradition had less of an impact on the penal system than it did in old decennaries. A principle constituent of Catholicism and the condemnable justness system is that incapacitation should be used to reshape the beneficent values of a market economic system on a individual footing ( Stotnicki, 2013 ) .

What is interesting about tendencies in societal justness and Catholicism is that in a Gallup canvass conducted in 2004, 71 % of Protestants and 66 % of Catholics support the usage of capital penalty ( Stotnicki, 2012 ) . Although this canvass was taken over 10 old ages ago, what is interesting is that capital penalty is non in line with the New Testament – although arguably, it is an Old Testament rule ; this is fodder against the statement that Catholicism has non taken a flexible attack in comparing to earlier old ages if the Gallup canvass is anything to travel by. On the other manus, sentiments ( peculiarly with people that identify as Catholic ) might be altering in every bit fast as 10 old ages.

The last issue that warrants reference on the subject of Catholicism and societal justness is the subject of same-sex matrimonies. The subject of same-sex matrimony is a societal justness issue because it is an issue which affects a big section of the population and it is a combative issue which has sparked argument over the last few decennaries in Western society. For case, Dempsey ( 2008 ) demonstrates that the Catholic Church holds the position that fortunes may increase the blameworthiness of a individual to prosecute in homosexual Acts of the Apostless ( p. 77 ) . Furthermore, Dempsey ( 2008 ) points out that Catholics believe that regard for the basic human self-respect of the homosexual entails regard for his ability to collaborate freely with God’s grace in turning from evil ways and encompassing a chaste life in Christian love ( Ibid. , p. 77 ) . The Catholic Church affirms the natural jurisprudence and Christian vision of matrimony as the loving and vitalizing brotherhood of a adult male and a adult female ( Dempsey, 2008, p.77 ) . Furthermore, the Catholic Congregation beliefs that “a individual prosecuting in homosexual behavior therefore Acts of the Apostless immorally.” ( Ibid. , p. 77 ) . The Catholic instruction so tries to take a scientific spin on the brotherhood of matrimony by reasoning that homosexual activity is non a complimentary brotherhood, able to convey life, and so it halts the call to life and therefore of self-giving, in which the Gospel claims is the kernel of Christian life. Therefore, the Catholic Church tries to utilize morality and scientific discipline to reason against the impression of same-sex matrimonies.

On one manus, the Catholic Church respects homophiles as people, yet on the other manus, portion of the statement calls such Acts of the Apostless “evil” and invites the “evil-doer” to encompass a chaste life in Christian love. Therefore, in this respect, the Catholic Church still has a long ways to travel before it deals entirely with the issues of same-sex matrimony and homosexualism.

Having said that, in an interview with Pope Francis in the summer of 2013, the Pope stated that while homosexual Acts of the Apostless were iniquitous, homosexual orientation was non. [ 2 ] This displacement in attitude although still rigorous but doing some leeway towards homosexualism, demonstrates that there has been a alteration to positions on homosexualism as the universe becomes more planetary and accepting of same-sex matrimonies.

The other ground why the subject of same-sex matrimony is a societal justness issue is because it has been an issue that has seen the interior of courtrooms throughout historical argument. For case, Olson and associates ( 2006 ) argue that public sentiment has had a major impact on same-sex matrimony discourse. Furthermore, Canadian instances likeM. v. H. [ 1999 ] has provided consciousness to the cause of same sex-marriages. In the instance ofM.v.H, the Supreme Court of Canada ordered Ontario to amend its definition of household to include cohabitation of spouses ( whether male or female ) . Therefore, in this instance, sapphic and cheery twosomes were given the same rights and duties that married, opposite-sex twosomes traditionally have.

Further to Olson and associates’ ( 2006, p. 342 ) survey, while Americans have become less willing to curtail the civil rights of homosexuals and tribades, faith has been seen as a sometimes equivocal influence on the sentiments on homosexualism. Once once more, these findings indicate that there have been little stairss in Catholic sentiments on homosexualism and same sex matrimony.

Decision

Skotnicki ( 2013 ) argues that the Catholic Church plays a limited function in finding American correctional policy due to a failure at discrepancy with important developments in its ain history ( p.1 ) . Skotnicki’s ( 2013 ) statement points to either a reform in Catholic policies in order to co-exist in the altering times, or more flexibleness in its mentality on condemnable justness patterns. In reviewing the consequence that Catholicism has had in the condemnable justness system, Stotnicki ( 2013 ) further argues that while the prison system needs a clear system of why it has the right to punish- non in footings of retribution of self-interest, but in footings of human life and human community, the Catholic Church has failed to supply important aid in turn toing the crisis of penalty and reoffending. What is clear is that the Catholic Church’s landscape is altering. For case, Curran ( 2010 ) states that the apprehension of the Church ( ecclesiology ) is altering, the sociological relationship of the Catholic Church to U.S. Society is altering, and the fortunes impacting societal justness, along with Catholicism, are altering in the United States. With these alterations, the societal mission of the Church is besides altering, therefore leting for more flexible patterns in societal justness and societal tolerance.

Mentions

Cook, A.E. , Jelen, G.T. , Wilcox, C. ( 1993 ) . Catholicity and Abortion: Attitudes in the American

States: A Contextual Analysis.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 32 ( 3 ) ,223-230.

Curran, E. C. ( 2010 ) . The Social Mission of the U.S. Catholic Church: A Theological

Position. ( Washington: Georgetown University Press ) .

Dempsey, J, R. ( 2008 ) . The Catholic Church’s learning about Same-Sex Marriage. The Linacre

Quarterly, Volume 75.

Graham, G. ( 1962 ) .The Power and the Glory. ( UK: Penguin Books ) .

M.v.H. [ 1999 ] 2. S.C.R. 3.

Mainwaring, S. ( 1986 ) .The Catholic Church and Politics in Brazil, 1910-1985. ( CA: Stanford

University Press ) .

Oliver, M. W. ( 2008 ) .Catholic Positions on Crime and Criminal Justice. ( MD: Lexington

Books ) .

Olson, L, R. , Cadge, W. , Harrison, T. J. ( 2006 ) . Religion and Public Opinion about same-sex

Marriage.Social Science Quarterly 87 ( 2 ).

“ Pope Francis: Who am I to judge homosexual people? ” BBC News. 29 July 2013. Retrieved 26 March

2015 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-23489702

Skotnicki, A. ( 2012 ) .The Last Judgment: Christian Ethical motives in a Legal Culture. ( Vermont:

Ashgate Publishing Company ) .

Skotnicki, A. ( 2013 ) . The U.S. Catholic Church and Criminal Justice.New Theology Review.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *