Social work and service users

TO WHAT EXTEND SHOULD SOCIAL WORK BE LED BY THE WISHES OF SERVICE USERS?

Introduction

Social work involves the betterment of the human status and positively altering how the society responds to ageless jobs. The profession is meant to heighten the quality of life and to guarantee each person realizes full potency in life. In chase of these ends societal workers work with communities, groups, households, persons more so the sick and hapless. For a long period of clip societal workers have been supplying services with less engagement of the users. They were considered receiving systems of the services whereas the workers were suppliers of services. This was seen to give small pick and liberty to the users. On the other manus the attention givers were trained to offer services to the users irrespective of how they felt about the service. Slowly, in a figure of western societies there is a turning tendency to alter the attack. The users are given more say in the mode they want to be treated. This is apprehensible sing that they are suffers and cognize better where the shoe Leontocebus oedipuss. Their sentiments have for a long period of clip been overlooked by the governments ( Banks, 2006 ) . To turn to this issue is both a challenge and an chance for bringing of better services.

Involvement of Service Users

There have been efforts in the recent yesteryear to hold engagement of service users in wellness and attention services. The consumer of societal service is perceived merely like a consumer of any other type of commercial service. This means that he or she is obliged to hold a pick, quality service, and value for money and even an avenue to kick ( Thompson, 2009 ) . There is much accent on the necessity to hold knowledge about the exact demands of the users based on research. It is non merely recommending for engagement or engagement of the users but a greater authorization. In this the power and control of the professionals is surrendered to the users. There are given a opportunity to command and run the services. This signifier of service bringing is rear and may non be realized shortly. Nevertheless efforts are being made to allow the user addition more information, cognition and accomplishments sing the power being bestowed on him.

Such a venture can turn out disputing to the users and those seeking to liberate them. Most of the users are nescient, handicapped, unfit physically and in bulk instances with a low ego regard. To affect them is bringing of service will necessitate much confidence, forbearance and friendliness from the workers ( Munday, 2007 ) . It is for this ground that preparation has been initiated for both the users and societal workers. This preparation enables them to better understand one another and work in coaction.

Merits of Involvement of the Users

There are a figure of grounds why the engagement of users in supplying service is critical. The most of import factor is to hold services reflect on the penchants and demands of the users. Similarly the users besides have to be able to take part in determination devising sing the bringing of the service. The latter ground is of import in the sense that the users gain more control over their lives. There are besides made to be flexible hence able to react to assorted demands at appropriate clip. Besides, the people will be able to unify as a group, place with one another and speak with one voice. In this manner they guarantee to give a new position and attack to undertake societal issues. The engagement of the users is besides indispensable in a sense as their input will be used in studies and other paperss. As a consequence most of the stuffs meant for this purpose become apprehensible to other service users, members of the populace and suppliers of services.

Though there are those who see the engagement of users as a challenge to the workers, it can really buoy up their work. Once societal workers and users trust each other and work together it becomes easy to present the services. It is easy to fulfill person who responds and gives waies on how he or she wants to be served. The societal workers will therefore non be required to trust so much on book reading but field experiences. The more they interact with users the more they get to cognize them and their jobs.

In most instances resources are scarce therefore doing societal work a challenge. To some extend the engagement of users can assist in proper resource allotment and avoid wastage ( Byers, 2005 ) . There are cases where societal workers provide what is non needed by users. Some of the resources are expensive yet do non to the full fulfill the demands of the users. It can be more prudent if the users are involved in the planning such that merely utile points are provided. In states such as Norway personal budgets have been helpful in covering with single demands ( Munday, 2007 ) . This attack whereby some hard currency is provided to persons has been really utile. Equally much as some critics will term the attack as expensive ; still it is a measure towards authorising the users.

In add-on single demands and outlooks vary with clip and context. The preparation of the societal workers demands to be updated frequently in order to turn to current fortunes. For this to be realized there must be intensive research carried out on the service users. Such a venture can turn out expensive and clip devouring to the societal workers. Alternatively the workers have the option of researching on the users as they provide services. The cognition and thoughts gotten from users can be utile in future pattern.

Barriers to Involvement

Despite these evident positives there are obstructions to the full execution of the program. The most important is the important minority users whose position may non be represented by the chosen few members go toing meetings. It is besides possible for the user representatives in the commission meetings non to efficaciously stand for wants of the full group of service users. It is hence a challenge to hold greater engagement and engagement of the people. The bulk of whom it may non be easy to reach.

Another hindrance is the professionals themselves. Traditionally power belonged to service suppliers and still most of them are loath to release the power. There is less willingness to portion power with users such that most of them are already intimidated to go to the meetings. This is particularly so with respect to determination devising. The professionals still want to be in control in allotment of resources. The premise is that leting users in determination devising would turn out dearly-won to the professionals. Such a venture is besides clip devouring sing tight agenda of the professionals. On the other manus the instruction staff has to be made cognizant of the emerging tendency in service bringing. As opposed to traditional patterns, the current attack emphasizes on sharing of power.

In bulk instances service users perceive themselves being secondary to the wants and dictates of the professionals. This has acted as an hindrance to their engagement. The users appear to be missing in cognition, accomplishments and apprehension ( Munday, 2007 ) . This makes them susceptible to development. In some instances their physical status does non look to prefer a meaningful engagement. Their personal sentiments and demands do non tally those of the professionals yet such concerns are seldom addressed by the governments. For this barrier to be surmounted there must be developing allotted to both service users and health professionals.

Apart from the people involved in societal work establishments besides act as a major obstruction. The constituted patterns and constructions of the organisations allow for small reforms. There is about no room to keep treatment for power sharing. The long established tradition in establishments makes power publish a slippery matter. The disposals are besides bureaucratic therefore shun engagement of the users. In some instances it is the deficiency of clear ends by the disposal. This becomes a barrier to originate any reforms in favour of engagement. However, changeless calls for consciousness may assist turn to the issue.

Time and resources besides prove as obstructions to the accomplishment of the ends. There must be adequate resources to run into the demands of the users ( Trevithick, 2005 ) . This may non be readily available hence calls for support to let the engagement of assorted stakeholders. Some of these seminars are dearly-won as participants have to be good catered for. The disbursals include reimbursements, conveyances costs and besides paying the services users. Similarly, establishments pose some troubles that need to be overcome. All the same at that place need to be commitment on the portion of the users. Time and energy have to be sacrificed of which bulk users can barely afford.

Furthermore in most states there is no legal proviso to recommend for the rights of the users. The political willingness is besides missing ( Adams, Dominelli and Payne, 2009 ) . This makes it is hard to force any docket refering users of the service. In some instances the statute law may be but are unequal to turn to the issue at manus. It hence becomes necessary for other avenues to be explored to guarantee that the concerns of users are addressed.

Finally there seem to be a linguistic communication barrier between some of the users and societal workers. In some instances the two speak different linguistic communications therefore can non pass on easy and efficaciously. Naturally this will necessitate the services of an translator who may non be readily available. In add-on the linguistic communication of the professionals may be excessively proficient doing meaningful communicating impossible. It is for this ground that professionals have to cut on the usage of slang and seek to simplify their linguistic communication. Sometimes it is merely linguistic communication that creates distance between users and societal workers.

Impact of User Participation

There is much grounds to demo the widespread popularity of user engagement. However, the impact of engagement is yet to be monitored. Equally much as there is willingness to let for engagement of users still establishments are stiff. The traditional systems, constructions and patterns are maintained. It makes it difficult for any meaningful reforms to be carried out.

In add-on users seem to be disbelieving about current plans. Harmonizing to positions from a figure of users their positions continued to be ignored. This is fundamentally because professionals in the field are unwilling to portion power. The users hence find it hard to happen a manner of holding there needs prioritized. It becomes critical for them to run into together and talk in one voice.

It is due to these grounds that larning establishments are advised to take note such that they help in conveying solutions to the job ( Davies, 2008 ) . Without a new manner of looking at the job and altering the system so the job is likely to prevail. The barriers that see to the marginalisation and neglect of positions of users can merely be addressed by altering traditional systems.

Expectations of the Service Users

Service users expect to be heard and their jobs listened to. This is in add-on to the demand to be valued as human existences. They crave for humane intervention, heat, candidly, and regard. The life style and civilizations of the users are besides to be respected. It is unfortunate that most of the societal workers disregard some of these issues. There is a inclination to conceive of those that are hapless or aged are non entitled to the best services.

Apart from this users are besides in demand of understanding and to work in coaction with societal workers. There differences as persons have to be acknowledged. Above all the demand for good communicating is emphasized. The communicating should be clear and consecutive forward. All mode of ambiguity should be shunned. Furthermore, professionals should seek every bit much as possible to avoid usage of slang.

Social work instruction is a utile tool to enable workers non to conceive of the status of the users. A societal worker has to invariably supervise the status of the users and respond consequently. Students on calling preparation have to be made cognizant from the oncoming to be respectful and unfastened to engagement with users. The positions of users need to be kept under consideration. It will besides guarantee there is partnership between service users and pupils on a day-to-day footing.

Service users are besides of import in supplying cognition and apprehension. Their positions and sentiments need to be taken with earnestness and equal value merely like those of professionals. Their experiences are indispensable to enable a successful engagement pattern. In many cases these experiences vary from those of professionals. This is non to be seen as anything out of the ordinary. In fact it can be used as a good background to break the instruction of the topic.

There is still necessitate for plans in societal work to let for user engagement and partnership with societal workers ( Wilson, Ruch, Lymbery, and Cooper 2008 ) . The hindrances outlined earlier should be done off with. The service users have identified a figure of issues which have to be tackled in order for there to be an effectual partnership. For case there is demand to get down a direct partnership with users. There cognition and experience should be incorporated in the services being provided. This means a continued nutriment of the partnership between the users of the service and those supplying the service.

The importance of engagement of more people can non be emphasized. This must include people with varied background and experience. The system should be in favour of inclusiveness such that there is a broad attack to challenges. Once users are able to joint their jobs and issues confronting them without experiencing intimidated so it would be a measure frontward. For this to be realized it would take more than merely engagement but direct attempt from the concerned parties.

Each and every person is alone. It is hence faulty for societal workers to give the same type of service to a figure of users. The truth is that even for persons, fortunes and demands change with clip. Those go toing to users must hence be sensitive to single ailments at peculiar times. Workers have to look at the history of patients and guarantee there was no misdiagnosis. Concern for the yesteryear of the patients boosts assurance and friendly relationship. Similarly, services can merely be implemented when there is trust between professionals and the users of services. It besides means the same staff should be maintained for a long as possible. An occasional alteration of staff gives a discontinued service to the users.

Position of the Workers

The societal workers excessively have demands and besides suffer from a figure of work related unwellnesss. The most common 1s are anxiousness, emphasis and depression. Merely as the users of the service, workers need support. This may be psychological, fiscal or religious. The bulk nevertheless do non unwrap their personal jobs since they see it as a failing on their portion ( Davies, 2008 ) . They are meant to react to the demands of others hence most of them bury the fact that they excessively have got demands. There are those that put the demands of others before there ain. Whereas the mainstreams come to believe hurt and concerns are inevitable and can non be done off with.

It is hence of import that workers are made to understand non merely the state of affairs of the ill but their personal state of affairss as good. On a day-to-day footing societal workers have to cover with a batch of issues most of which depend on their determinations. They non merely have persons to cover with but households, groups and communities. Furthermore the resources are scarce such that workers have to happen a manner to portion every bit. Their work is punctuated with tonss of uncertainnesss ; contradictions, hazards and tenseness ( Davis, 2008 ) . Everyday workers face a figure of challenges. It is non ever smooth as they rely on their ain judgement to work out some jobs. This becomes even more complicated in times of crisis. The bulk are denied clip to pass with household and even loosen up with friends. All the same the workers are expected to present the best service to users. They need to concentrate and listen to whatever ailments the users put across ( Levin, E. , 2004 ) .

Decision

It is beyond uncertainty that users of societal services need to be involved in societal work. For a long period of clip they have been sidelined and their positions suppressed by the governments. In some manner this engagement will assist to turn to some of issues that users feel are being neglected. Service users need to develop a personal relationship and trust with societal workers. They have to be listened to, respected and empowered. It is merely when they are free with workers, confine to one another that the work will run swimmingly. On the other manus it is non traveling to be an easy undertaking for societal workers. The outlooks of users are many and varied. In order to run into all of them workers have to be adept and experient. Furthermore governments have to guarantee scarceness of resources and bureaucratism is dealt with. This will give ample clip to the workers. All in all the two parties are to work in concurrence with one another, regard and value each other. It is non needfully that all the wants of service users be met but at least regard and apprehension should predominate.

The fact that societal work has to be done in coaction there is demand for preparation for both service users and workers. Once the two parties participate in developing it becomes a batch easier to work together. It will non be a inquiry of reacting to the wants of users. Some of the groups and or persons need a batch of counsel and guidance. There are those that can barely understand themselves and necessitate a batch of aid. Again preparation may non travel good with most of the users. Majority will non see the utility of preparation. Others may every bit good ignore. Nevertheless establishments that train societal workers should turn to the altering functions of users in societal work. The alumnuss should be adept and flexible plenty to react to the ambitious environment.

Mentions

  • Adams, R. , Dominelli, L & A ; Payne, M. , 2009. Social Work: Subjects, Issues and Critical Debates.3rd erectile dysfunction. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Banks, S. , 2006. Ethical motives and Valuess In Social Work. British Journal of Social Work. 37 ( 1 ) :161-162 ;
  • Byers, C. , 2005. Towards a Meaningful engagement of People Using Service and Carers in Social Work instruction: development Schemes for Good pattern. School of Social Community and Health Studies. Retrieved on November 13, 2009 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bemidjistate.edu/academics/publications/social_work_journal/issue11/articles/byers.htm
  • Davies, M. , ( erectile dysfunction ) 2008. The Blackwell comrade to societal work. Blackwell Publishers Ltd
  • Davis, A. , 2008. What Service Users Expect From Social Work. International Conference on Social Work Education. Tblisi State University, Georgia July 1-2 2008. Retrieved on 18 November 2009 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.ceimh.bham.ac.uk/documents/Ann_Georgia_presentation.pdf
  • Levin, E. , 2004. Involving Service Users and Carers In Social Work Education. Social Care Institute for Excellence. Retrieved on November 18, 2009 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.scie.org.uk/publications/guides/guide04/files/guide04.pdf
  • Munday, B. , 2007. Report on User Involvement in Personal Social services. Retrieved on 13 November 13, 2009 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.coe.int/t/dg3/socialpolicies/socialrights/source/ID4758-Userinvolvementinpersonalsocialservices.pdf
  • Thompson, N. , 2009. Understanding Social Work: Preparing for pattern. Palgrave Macmillan
  • Trevithick, P. , 2005. Social Work Skills: A Practice Handbook. 2nd Ed. Open University Press.
  • Wilson, K. , Ruch G. , Lymbery M. , Cooper A. 2008. Social Work: An Introduction to Contemporary Practice. Longman.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *